For better or for worse, I'm not the same writer I was when I started this novel.

For better or for worse, I'm not the same writer I was when I started this novel.
We live in a world of blogs, social networks, and portfolio sites, but how do you determine which site should get which of your work? I've now joined Flickr, 500px, Instagram, and Picasa. Then there are the blogs/streams, like Twitter, Facebook, Google+, and Posterous. All this, and I'm not even a full-time professional photographer!
So my question is how can we gain balance? What type of work should go where? I've seen various methods of organization. Some post their best work on either Flickr or 500px and put the other shots they liked but don't think are THE shot on their blog. Some use Google+ or Facebook as a Flickr/500px substitute, showing off their best work from a shoot or outing as an album. Twitter often just links Twitter followers to one of their other sites (as opposed to uploading the photo to Twitter itself or a Twitter-integrated photo host like TwitPic or yFrog). People who use Google+ heavily use Picasa, because that's Google+'s photo host. But then where does that leave Instagram - the so-called casual photo app for people who want a quick filter from a smartphone shot without taking the time to edit the image? I've seen semi-professional and pro photographers use it for good photography, but I've also seen celebrities and non-celebrities (us regular folks) use it as a photo blog akin to Flickr. With all these options, why do so many people choose all of them? And why have I? It's probably because they all do something well, and because there's no one site that does it all perfectly, we grasp at everything to build many networks instead of creating one humongous monopoly of a network that does it all.I exhaust myself trying to find the right uses for all my networks, and often fail in the process, ending up so annoyed by the whole thing that I don't upload any photos at all.
Such is life. I guess. Any thoughts?
I do love me my electronics...
[Note that these are straight from my phone and were not edited/enhanced. Some are a little darker than I'd like, but I wanted to get them up.]
Fantastic. The owl has a pipe, too.
Pierre Bernard, star of the "Pierre Bernard's Recliner of Rage" sketch (and Sgt. O'Brien on Stargate SG-1) drew a characiture of Steve (inexplicably with no beard). Pierre did not seem as angry as he is portrayed.
Conan himself made an appearance, but it was before I'd arrived.
I prefer to call this one "The Man and The Myth".
Entitled "Conan and Daughter". I thought it was a re-enactment of his daughter's dismay when he shaved his beard, but Steve pointed out, "But what about the way it's shaved?" I guess we'll leave this one open for interpretation.
Amazing.
Called "Beardpocolypse". Notice the missing pixel in the "after" drawing.
The Conan Cone! (As seen in the documentary about Conan's between-TV-shows comedy tour.)
Stuffed Conan!
Conan Pencilism, is what they called it.
Trippy...
Poor Andy... Looks like it was drawn in MS Paint.
OWL!
Binary art!
Pixel art! We agreed his hair was one pixel too low.
Alas, the portable museum has packed up and moved back to its hometown, but I hope this sample has amused you enough to start your weekend off well.
Good times are coming. Gobble gobble! Happy November!
The weekend is near! Have a good Friday, and don’t forget to take some time in the next days to simply hang around and recharge your batteries!
Photos from neon.tambourine, Al Lafolie, and ~ cynthiak ~.
I feel like this most days.